Thursday, June 16, 2011

referendum nucleare

images Tags: referendum, nucleare referendum nucleare. ha indetto il referendum
  • ha indetto il referendum



  • mlk
    03-10 08:15 AM
    Nice renders Eilsoe and Grinch--both very dramatic. Here's mine--it feels unfinished but this is all I had time for.

    http://www.inmod.com/casey/3dsubway_final.jpg

    Very groovy. And I like to see XSI work because, well, I haven't seen a lot from this package !

    Top notch, my favorite so far.





    wallpaper ha indetto il referendum referendum nucleare. relativo al nucleare.
  • relativo al nucleare.



  • vivid_bharti
    05-06 05:08 PM
    We thought the same way 3 years ago, 2 years ago, and last year too, but nothing happened, it could be another year and we could be sitting here in same situation 2 years from now. Question is when IV has already collected money for FOIA request than why it is not proceeding in that direction ? We get it in time or not is not the question now.... Its too late. I am sure in coming 15 months whole immigration system will be changed. May be we will see point based system or something different. And at that time information will be no use.





    referendum nucleare. Referendum nucleare giugno
  • Referendum nucleare giugno



  • anurakt
    12-30 11:51 PM
    Add St.Louis --- www.myilaaka.com





    2011 relativo al nucleare. referendum nucleare. Ambiente | May 24, 2011 | 0
  • Ambiente | May 24, 2011 | 0



  • h1-b forever
    01-24 09:16 AM
    I feel frustrated at some peoples' unwillingness to admit that EB3 needs IV's help now more than ever. They are saying that nothing much can be done for EB3, as INS merely corrected its wrong interpretation in visa allocation

    But, if we are all willing to put our hearts and minds to it we can surely come up with new ideas that will help our cause. Surely, laws are written so that justice can happen. So if justice is not happening, the law would have some answer, somewhere.

    Let me put forward my idea.

    The INA language says that until EB2 is not current, there will be no spillover to EB3. Agreed. But I would contend that this statement is on a year to year basis. That is, if in the year 2002 (for example) all EB2 has been satisfied, then the spillovers should go to year 2002 EB3.

    Is this something IV can point out and fight for? Can EB3 members put their money and efforts in this direction? Let me know if this sounds worthwhile

    GK,

    I think you do have a point. Let me do some research and contact some attorneys as well on this. Will also check with the IV leadership on their thoughts on this point.

    Cheers,
    Rayoflight

    Did anything come of this plan? Is this doable?



    more...


    referendum nucleare. pubblica middot; Nucleare,
  • pubblica middot; Nucleare,



  • LondonTown
    09-01 08:05 AM
    I am doing my online MBA right now , if you need more info Private message me.

    Are you doing from Aspen?





    referendum nucleare. Consultazione su nucleare e
  • Consultazione su nucleare e



  • aquarianf
    08-03 02:42 PM
    According to the person I spoke to:
    1. I will be issued an RFE if my AOS packet did not contain the EVL
    2. Once the A# is issued, that means the application has been accepted, so no outright rejection can happen, however RFEs can be issued at a later date.


    Did you ask if you can send EVE separately by quoting receipt number or A# well before they issue any RFE on this?



    more...


    referendum nucleare. referendum-nucleare-2011
  • referendum-nucleare-2011



  • battineni
    08-10 02:35 PM
    I am in. I am EB2 but I support this because this makes sense.

    Thanks for your heartful support.... we need more people like you to support.





    2010 Referendum nucleare giugno referendum nucleare. Tags: referendum, nucleare
  • Tags: referendum, nucleare



  • logiclife
    01-26 03:50 PM
    Please mention details of your issue since most of members here are either in the labor black hole or under EB retrogression waiting to file for I 485. If you know something and if its WIDESPREAD and affects almost all applicants, please mention it here in details. We can include that in our agenda so that we dont have to fight for those issues when we do file for 485 in the future.



    more...


    referendum nucleare. Referendum 2011 Nucleare e
  • Referendum 2011 Nucleare e



  • nlssubbu
    09-28 02:19 PM
    Yes, thanks for all your comments, and I would only request everyone to participate more actively on IV stuff. Start building your state chapters, spread the message.

    When IV was expecting 10000 people for the rally only 2000 + came. It is obvious that America needs us and we need America and we must all unite to make this a better place.

    Jane - your points taken. But, it is not all about rasicm. In a cosmopolitan society, everyone is same. It is just the fact that the communities from the majority opposue us.

    A good example is Ron Hira. He is 100% Indian immigrant. He has been one of the architects behind the Durbin Grassley provisions.

    So many people who work against us are the recent green card holders. A good example of such people who lurk in our forums is Senthil1. He got his green card and wants to do as much damage as possible for future immigrants, so that he is always in demand and does not face competition.

    Since 1970s Indians and Chinese have migrated as doctors and engineers and have been in top positions here. If you are trying to immigrate today - you are a direct competition to their children who are raised here with comforts, they are the ones who influence the govt with restrictive policies.

    Recently Jay(logiclife) was on a radio station and the person interviewing jay was a radio jockey of Indian origin. He is definitely not the highly skilled types, and he was behaving exactly like Ron Hira types

    Hi Chandu,

    Not all GC holders are against the aspiring GC seekers. In fact, I am promoting IV actively to many older GC holders and exposing how bad the system is now when compared to their days. [Say from 10 years ago]. I am trying my best to help many, who are in line with what ever little knowledge I gained during this process. I will be happier one and only if this broken system is fixed and the process is made transparent. I only wish that this will happen during my life time :p

    Thanks

    PS: I did not had IV during the time when I started my GC process :mad:





    hair Ambiente | May 24, 2011 | 0 referendum nucleare. Referendum sul nucleare è
  • Referendum sul nucleare è



  • RNGC
    02-19 01:42 PM
    Read this carefully before you comment here:
    "fingerprints for information relating to criminal, national security, or other law enforcement actions that would render the alien ineligible for adjustment of status under this section".

    This is just to verify if the guys is in database for any criminal activity. ofcourse they will not give an illegal guy a GC if they have his record in database for criminal activity in US. This is just a formal requirement to keep illegal law brokers out because there are thousands illegals who came here from southern border and have committed crimes. There are some even in the America's Top 10 Wanted list. My uncles(came illegally here) went through all criminal checks by FBI for breaking any law,when Reagan gave amnesty for >5 years. Same criminal checks were done on illegals when Clinton helped legalalization of illegals. Fingerprints, etc are just for other criminal history check not to check if the person crossed the border illegally, ofcouse he did and broke the law: that's the whole point for him being illegal.

    In fact >5year rule has been a standard to give immigration to illegals as is clear by Reagan amnesty. If 5 year rule is not for illegals, then what do you think is there in this bill for 11 million illegals. Itn't that logical. Infact main purpose of this bill is to fix illegal immigrants not legals. If you think >5 years rule is just for legals, you need to read history books, read text carefully and be more logical: not blinded by desire to get your own GC if you are here >5years.

    Either way: I never said we should oppose the 5 year requirement. I just said that rules for "Legal <5 years" should be easier than rules for "illegal>5" years and please don't propagate false rumors here that this bill is just for legals in a blind desire for your own GC.


    So what if illegals are also covered in this! Illegals are kind of people suffering from their employers because they don't have any paperwork! We, are slightly better, we have paper work and still suffer at the hands of our employers, so we know their plight...So, I would say illegals also have to be considered. I DO NOT SUPPORT ILLEGALS. But they are human beings too and are living in the dark.....

    My take on ilegals is:
    1. Build a huge prison and put all of them in there and feed them rest of their life.
    OR
    2. Arrest all of them and deport them their home country
    IF 1 or 2 is not possible, better give them green card as long as they have not committed any crime and legalize them so no one takes advantage of them...we have had one round of slavery in this country and its consequence is still felt, lets not have another round of slavery with illegals.



    more...


    referendum nucleare. Il referendum sul nucleare
  • Il referendum sul nucleare



  • delax
    07-20 10:03 AM
    Also conversations will affect this because people converting from EB3 to EB2 will make sure that they port their priority dates and hence if say all the EB3 people from 2003 convert to EB2 and successfully port their dates it will definitely push the dates south of 2003. Did I make sense???

    You are correct. EB3 to EB2 conversions can impact the movement of dates - but there are a few factors working against that. Refiling labor and I-140 is an expensive affair and not everyone may be ready to shell out nearly $10k. Besides the time taken nowadays for labor and I-140 approval means that the conversion can happen only in about 12 to 18 months or so. The third variable is also the close scrutniy (read audit) that DOL is doing of EB2 labor applications. If people started conversions last year they should be good. But if someone plans to start it now, then I think it is a shot in the dark - however from an EB3 perspective, a shot in the dark may be better than no shot at all.





    hot pubblica middot; Nucleare, referendum nucleare. Referendum Nucleare
  • Referendum Nucleare



  • srikondoji
    12-27 09:13 AM
    Hi all,
    By the end of the day, i will post an article in two different websites. However, there is another idea, i want throw in here, which can bring much more publicity and coverage.

    Did anybody hear the services of 'Press Release'? Iam sure few members here know about it.
    Look here for more details http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=press+release

    The cost will be in the range of $100 to $400 which includes article writeup and release of the news item to 100's of publishers and we can even choose the location/region where these publications can occur. It can include news papers and or web only releases. Most of such releases have got wide distribution including nytimes/washingtonpost, google news, yahoo news and other indian news papers.

    Should we give this a try?
    Thanks



    more...


    house SÌ AI REFERENDUM DEL 12 E 13 referendum nucleare. volantino referendum nucleare
  • volantino referendum nucleare



  • arnab221
    09-26 09:39 AM
    This is bad what has happened. They need to be educated about the protest.

    Is there any email address to the CNN editor? I can writeup a message about this.


    You can send the message to editor from the message itself . We should all do that and educate them about what we really need .





    tattoo Consultazione su nucleare e referendum nucleare. Tag:referendum nucleare
  • Tag:referendum nucleare



  • nirenjoshi
    03-09 12:53 PM
    EB3 ROW has been retrogressed as predicted in Oh's website.
    All non-India EB3 are at March 03 now....
    Will they keep them at March 03 for few months and give a bump to EB3?

    Something is cooking...Otherwise they wouldn't retrogress ROW by almost 2 years...

    From the bulletin -

    E. RETROGRESSON OF THE WORLDWIDE, MEXICO, AND PHILIPPINES EMPLOYMENT THIRD PREFERENCE CUT-OFF DATES FOR APRIL

    Despite the established cut-off date having been held for the past five months in an effort to keep demand within the average monthly usage targets, the amount of demand being received from Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) Offices for adjustment of status cases remains extremely high. Therefore, it has been necessary to retrogress the April cut-off dates in an attempt to hold demand within the FY-2009 annual limit. Since over 60 percent of the Worldwide and Philippines Employment Third preference CIS demand received this year has been for applicants with priority dates prior to January 1, 2004, the cut-off date has been retrogressed to 01MAR03 to help ensure that the amount of future demand is significantly reduced. As indicated in the last sentence of Item A, paragraph 1, of this bulletin, this cut-off date will be applied immediately. It should also be noted that further retrogression or �unavailability� at any time cannot be ruled out.

    It has also been necessary to retrogress the Employment Third Preference Other Worker cut-off date for all countries in order to hold the issuance level within the annual limit.



    more...


    pictures referendum-nucleare-2011 referendum nucleare. Referendum 2011: CasaPound
  • Referendum 2011: CasaPound



  • eb3_nepa
    04-10 08:07 AM
    Instead of letting members open 4 different threads, it is best that IV core itself opens the thread in RED so that it catches people's eyes and they post their comments in one spot rather than 4. AND it helps highlight the fact the bulletin is actually out.





    dresses Referendum Nucleare referendum nucleare. referendum nucleare salti?
  • referendum nucleare salti?



  • jonty_11
    07-05 03:47 PM
    Thx for the update Pappu...
    Go IV go!



    more...


    makeup Referendum 2011 Nucleare e referendum nucleare. SÌ AI REFERENDUM DEL 12 E 13
  • SÌ AI REFERENDUM DEL 12 E 13



  • ramus
    07-01 07:04 PM
    Pappu,

    You don't need to be so polite with this member.. He/she just joined IV. Haven't done anything for IV.. Don't know what IV is doing any now start talking about IV core doing partying..



    No we are not partying. Welcome to IV. Please update your profile with full information. Thanks.





    girlfriend Tag:referendum nucleare referendum nucleare. si vota per il referendum.
  • si vota per il referendum.



  • kumar1
    07-31 03:18 PM
    x





    hairstyles Il referendum sul nucleare referendum nucleare. Nucleare, la Cassazione dice
  • Nucleare, la Cassazione dice



  • yabadaba
    12-27 08:22 AM
    this was back in 2004...was on opt till then...wellsfargo just needed my h1b approval notice to approve my mortgage

    plus for tax purposes u r considered a permanent resident. that means u have lived in ur state for x number of days in a calendar year...never had issues with getting credit cards, car loan, etc.

    of course i had 4 yrs of credit history before that..dont know if that helped.





    sat0207
    04-27 09:23 AM
    Immigration Security Checks

    �How and Why the Process Works

    Background All applicants for a U.S. immigration benefit are subject to criminal and national security background checks to ensure they are eligible for that benefit. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the Federal agency that oversees immigration benefits, performs checks on every applicant, regardless of ethnicity, national origin or religion. Since 2002, USCIS has increased the number and scope of relevant background checks, processing millions of security checks without incident. However, in some cases, USCIS customers and immigrant advocates have expressed frustration over delays in processing applications, noting that individual customers have waited a year or longer for the completion of their adjudication pending the outcome of security checks. While the percentage of applicants who find their cases delayed by pending background checks is relatively small, USCIS recognizes that for those affected individuals, the additional delay and uncertainty can cause great anxiety. Although USCIS cannot guarantee the prompt resolution of every case, we can assure the public that applicants are not singled out based on race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin. USCIS strives to balance the need for timely, fair and accurate service with the need to ensure a high level of integrity in the decision-making process. This fact sheet outlines the framework of the immigration security check process, explaining its necessity, as well as factors contributing to delays in resolving pending cases. Why USCIS Conducts Security Checks USCIS conducts security checks for all cases involving a petition or application for an immigration service or benefit. This is done both to enhance national security and ensure the integrity of the immigration process. USCIS is responsible for ensuring that our immigration system is not used as a vehicle to harm our nation or its citizens by screening out people who seek immigration benefits improperly or fraudulently. These security checks have yielded information about applicants involved in violent crimes, sex crimes, crimes against children, drug trafficking and individuals with known links to terrorism. These investigations require time, resources, and patience and USCIS recognizes that the process is slower for some customers than they would like. Because of that, USCIS is working closely with the FBI and other agencies to speed the background check process. However, USCIS will never grant an immigration service or benefit before the required security checks are completed regardless of how long those checks take.

    To ensure that immigration benefits are given only to eligible applicants, USCIS adopted background security check procedures that address a wide range of possible risk factors. Different kinds of applications undergo different levels of scrutiny. USCIS normally uses the following three background check mechanisms but maintains the authority to conduct other background investigations as necessary:

    � The Interagency Border Inspection System (IBIS)

    Name Check� IBIS is a multiagency effort with a central system that combines information from multiple agencies, databases and system interfaces to compile data relating to national security risks, public safety issues and other law enforcement concerns. USCIS can quickly check information from these multiple government agencies to determine if the information in the system affects the adjudication of the case. Results of an IBIS check are usually available immediately. In some cases, information found during an IBIS check will require further investigation. The IBIS check is not deemed completed until all eligibility issues arising from the initial system response are resolved.

    � FBI Fingerprint Check�FBI fingerprint checks are conducted for many applications. The FBI fingerprint check provides information relating to criminal background within the United States. Generally, the FBI forwards responses to USCIS within 24-48 hours. If there is a record match, the FBI forwards an electronic copy of the criminal history (RAP sheet) to USCIS. At that point, a USCIS adjudicator reviews the information to determine what effect it may have on eligibility for the benefit. Although the vast majority of inquiries yield no record or match, about 10 percent do uncover criminal history (including immigration violations). In cases involving arrests or charges without disposition, USCIS requires the applicant to provide court certified evidence of the disposition. Customers with prior arrests should provide complete information and certified disposition records at the time of filing to avoid adjudication delays or denial resulting from misrepresentation about criminal history. Even expunged or vacated convictions must be reported for immigration purposes.

    � FBI Name Checks�FBI name checks are also required for many applications. The FBI name check is totally different from the FBI fingerprint check. The records maintained in the FBI name check process consist of administrative, applicant, criminal, personnel and other files compiled by law enforcement. Initial responses to this check generally take about two weeks. In about 80 percent of the cases, no match is found. Of the remaining 20 percent, most are resolved within six months. Less than one percent of cases subject to an FBI name check remain pending longer than six months. Some of these cases involve complex, highly sensitive information and cannot be resolved quickly. Even after FBI has provided an initial response to USCIS concerning a match, the name check is not complete until full information is obtained and eligibility issues arising from it are resolved. For most applicants, the process outlined above allows USCIS to quickly determine if there are criminal or security related issues in the applicant�s background that affect eligibility for immigration benefits. Most cases proceed forward without incident. However, due to both the sheer volume of security checks USCIS conducts, and the need to ensure that each applicant is thoroughly screened, some delays on individual applications are inevitable. Background checks may still be considered pending when either the FBI or relevant agency has not provided the final response to the background check or when the FBI or agency has provided a response, but the response requires further investigation or review by the agency or USCIS. Resolving pending cases is time-consuming and labor-intensive; some cases legitimately take months or evenseveral years to resolve. Every USCIS District Office performs regular reviews of the pending caseload to determine when cases have cleared and are ready to be decided. USCIS does not share information about the records match or the nature or status of any investigation with applicants or their representatives.





    meridiani.planum
    07-20 06:10 AM
    .... can some one let me know if during 2005 when perm was instigated was regular labor processing also going on or was it completed stopped during that time....


    upto March 2005 everything was pre-PERM, post March everything is PERM.
    Those stats in the earlier post refer to only PERM LCs (1350 for India).

    However I think there are going to be quite a few people with 2004/2005 pre-PERM PDs. In both mine as well as my wife's offices (big silicon valley companies) two things happened between Q4-2004 & Q1-2005 that contributed to many people with that PD:
    - lawyers rushed in with filings because PERM was new, not well understood, and any case that they could file earlier, they did.
    - the company had a policy of not filing GC after layoffs (2002/2003/2004) and by mid-2004 to end-2004 the economy had recovered enough that the companies felt comfortable starting GC processing again. All of us landed up in queue at the same time.

    If you look at the data also you see this 'anomaly' where there is a big 'clump' of cases with PD jan/feb/march 2005.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment